[boxed]

Playing devils advocate a bit:

Maybe he's starting that project because the state of the art is just so abhorrently bad that two years is plenty of time to see some really low hanging fruit.

I mean, this seems very plausible to me. There's plenty of areas where this type of things happen. All the time.

[joenot443]

But it’s _not_ abhorrently bad. There are so, so many high quality platforms out there which exist solely to teach coding. It’s not 1990 where people learn C++ from a textbook anymore, the bar for good programming education is actually incredibly high now.

I’m of the opinion that coding just something not everyone is going to like, just as I’ve never enjoyed painting or basketball. I don’t think there’s a lack of good tools, we just started with an incorrect premise that it’s possible to design a tool that makes someone like something that they assuredly don’t.

[boxed]

Can you name some? I know of Scratch.. and that's mostly it.

[411111111111111]

It really isn't plausible at all. The students are teenagers so the biggest hurdle is always going to be social, not tools.

It just can't be solved by tech, unless it's a complete paradigm shift such as sentient AI teachers with emotions having productive 1on1s with students in a full-dive style VR style environment.