Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sbuk 1099 days ago
Why only Trillion dollar mega corps?
1 comments

Who said only?

But scale is a quality on its own and should be taken into consideration.

> "But scale is a quality on its own and should be taken into consideration."

Why?

Because the scale of these companies gives them immense power and control over people's devices and (digital) lives. The size of the corporation leads to a geometric increase of power through network effects.

Now that you have an answer, what are you actually trying to ask? Do you have an issue with megacorps providing more control to users?

I have a problem with any kind of absolutes. I also have a problem with a self-appointed tech commenters deciding what is best for everyone else due to their own biases. There is essentially a Google/Apple duopololy, but let's not pretend there are no other choices. Neither company is stopping anyone buying Fairphones, Pinephone, or whatever other libre devices exist on the market if that's what the individual wants.
> "I have a problem with any kind of absolutes."

What absolutes?

> "I also have a problem with a self-appointed tech commenters deciding what is best for everyone else due to their own biases."

This sounds like you.

> "but let's not pretend there are no other choices."

Nobody is confused by the current choices. Saying that the iPhone can't do the thing today that we want it to do in the future is just repeating a fact that is literally the reason for the discussion in the first place.

And yes it's strange to take the side of a trillion-dollar megacorp instead of users, especially considering the size and power of such a company.

> "What absolutes?"

"Trillion dollar corporations should give their users all the choice and flexibility they want, not the other way around." is an absolute.

> "This sounds like you."

My 5 year old would respond with a better comeback than "I know you are, but what am I?"

> "Saying that the iPhone can't do the thing today that we want it to do in the future is just repeating a fact that is literally the reason for the discussion in the first place."

Who the fuck are we?! Have you asked iPhone users? Or just your immediate circle? No. We is the arrogant, opinionated "power users" and tech-commenters that think that the know what is best for everyone else.

> "And yes it's strange to take the side of a trillion-dollar megacorp instead of users, especially considering the size and power of such a company."

I'm not. I'm siding with the status quo, which is a considerably safer environment for the vast majority of iPhone users (yes, including me, a actual user of the software and hardware made by the megacorp) than that of what your are espousing.

At least I know not to invest in your fund, especially given your aversion to businesses that make money.