Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bryanrasmussen 1099 days ago
I gotta say I don't see the point of the two compute requirements - the measure energy and reduce energy consumption part seems like it would be something a company would want to do by itself as that is a cost.

and I'm not sure what disclosing the training time and power used to train the model tells anyone?

on edit: tells anyone that is a consumer of the product and might have legitimate worries which would be a good prompt to legislation, added edit in for eager HN downvoter who didn't like my asking the question.

1 comments

I think they just learned something from the history of crypto currencies, and this time they want hard data from the beginning. I know it's really apples to oranges, but having this 10 years ago for crypto might have pushed the tech from proof-of-work to e.g. proof-of-stake from the beginning.

And in the end there's no limits in this act. It's not like they're saying "No models above 10 GWh inside the EU!".

Why should there be models above 10GWh inside the EU?