|
|
|
|
|
by brabel
1094 days ago
|
|
It's kind of funny that you think you would be able to produce wine 100,000 years ago. Do you know what grapes used to look like back then? Well, they were absolutely not the giant balls of sweetness we see today :D. They became that after thousands of years of selection by humans. Which first had to "invent" agriculture, which was not easy and it's still quite unclear whether the earliest civilizations that adopted it were better off until they actually became capable of creating large city-states which could then go on to dominate all their neighbours and started accumulating power. So, 100,000 years ago you would need to convince people to join you in this crazy agriculture thing without any metal tools.... without domesticated animals either, by the way... as that would still be thousands of years in the future... Finally, just taking a large amount of food and leaving it for a long time to ferment somewhere well protected, while everyone around is hungry, would be a huge challenge already. You might need to protect it both from people and from very large wild animals that had not gone extinct yet and would love to take that food from you (and likely use you as food also). |
|
I can convince my first followers by doing the first crops and batches myself, alone.
Usage of animals and metal tools in agriculture came much later. I don't need that to start. I just need fire and ceramics.
Of course it wouldn't be _easy_. Empires are never easy.
Ultimately, what I'm saying is the context of the original comment about soap: food tech would be more succesful than soap tech.