|
|
|
|
|
by hedora
1102 days ago
|
|
In the end, google reimplemented Java, and the supreme court ruled on a very narrow piece of the reimplementation. I think it came down to a former sun/oracle employee at google actually copy pasting code from the original java code base. I'm reasonably sure they could reimplement CUDA from a copyright / trademark perspective. It's possible that they could be blocked with patents though. |
|
IIRC, the verbatim copying of rangeCheck didn't make it to SCOTUS. They really did instead rule on the copyrightability of the "structure, sequence, and organization" of the Java API as a whole.