|
|
|
|
|
by medo-bear
1096 days ago
|
|
The US, a sole world leader in the 1990s-2000s, had the responsibility and opportunity to uphold international law. Instead they chose to function as an imperialist power. Today they claim to protect international law. EDIT: RESPONSE TO BELLOW > Russia was already violating the human rights chapters in ‘95 Correction, Russia was already violating rights of its own citizens in 1993 [0] with full US blessings [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_Russian_constitutional_cr... |
|
That’s a hell of a punt there. You said “the US set the precedent” for disregarding international law, starting by citing the bombing of Yugoslavia in ‘99. Russia was already violating the human rights chapters in ‘95, and the Soviet Union (alongside America) was violating the foreign-intervention chapters since basically they were penned.
So no, there was no precedent. America continued with the status quo. You’re arguing Washington failed to create a new precedent, as it did when it had global nuclear hegemony in the aftermath of WWII. That’s a legitimate argument. But a different one from that which you’re making.