|
|
|
|
|
|
by bwarp
5220 days ago
|
|
|
Upvoted. Spot on. It's nowhere near as dynamic as a basic dynamic language. So much so that I just don't bother with dynamic in C# (I also don't bother with nullable types and a load of other features as well but that's another story). However, I don't find that a problem. I tend to prefer the correctness of statically typed languages these days. |
|
|