|
|
|
|
|
|
by frankc
1101 days ago
|
|
|
I don't think that is true, or at least I have not seen that anywhere. My understanding is this bill removes any kind of non-competes. It was already basically unenforcible to have an unpaid non-compete in New York (through common law) |
|
|
That is not true - there are four criteria for non-competes to be valid in NY, and payment for the duration is not one of them.
> I don't think that is true, or at least I have not seen that anywhere. My understanding is this bill removes any kind of non-competes.
There are two bills - one of them requires payment for noncompetes.