|
|
|
|
|
by xp84
1107 days ago
|
|
Using insane prices and then marking them down to reasonable levels "as an insurance discount" only has a few possible purposes and none of them are good: 1. Ripping off anyone without insurance who doesn't realize they may be able to negotiate it
2. Misrepresenting the true cost of healthcare for anyone who goes off the "original price"
3. Establishing that insurance companies have to push for deep, 90%+ discounts on everything, meaning nobody can offer sane pricing because the insurance company will say "But <HOSPITAL> gives us 95% off!" I recently had a genetic test done. They told me that if my cost after insurance was more than $200 they'd notify me ahead of time so I could decide how to proceed, one option was a simple pay-cash option for $250. Turns out the "Amount billed" to insurance was $ 25,000, which was then "discounted" by about $ 24,600 and they were paid $400 or something. So, this is a service the lab is happy to provide for $250 -- and they make money at that price, yet in some fantasy universe, $ 25,000 is in play. This is why people want to burn the US health system to the ground. |
|
Ultimately the end user is paying $250/300. Eg, my counselor example.