|
|
|
|
|
by dekhn
1097 days ago
|
|
But these language models are implicitly trained on knowledge by being fed large amounts of factual text, which (I presume) allows it to generate text that is factual (statistically more frequently than hallucinating nonfactual information). So probably recent models (which were being trained around the time the parrots paper came out) are really implict knowledge models already. Obviously they don't have embodiment, and it's still unclear to me what level of true embodiment in the actual, real, physical world is required to make these models more than just "parrots". |
|