|
|
|
|
|
by mtlmtlmtlmtl
1103 days ago
|
|
Yeah, agreed. 2 rooks vs queen is much easier to play for the queen in most cases, I've found. The queen can be good as a single piece whereas the rooks have to coordinate, which is hard when there's a queen on the board ready to fork. Often the rooks end up having to defend eachother, and if this happens suboptimally they can become very immobilised on a useless file or rank whereas the queen can fly around the board attacking stuff at will. Like you said, material imbalance is very difficult to evaluate and understand. I generally recommend not to incorporate them into one's play until ~1700 FIDE elo. Though sometimes you're forced into it of course. It's also a matter of style. I personally love materially imbalanced positions, and I'm pretty good at them, so I incorporate a fair bit of exchange sacrifices into my play. Because then I often get positions I understand better than my opponent and that makes up for the material on its own, I find. But other players just prefer a different style of play and maybe shouldn't go for it even if objectively it's the best move, because they'll end up misplaying the position. |
|