|
|
|
|
|
by treis
1104 days ago
|
|
>I see this view a lot - what I rarely ever see is a concrete discussion about what exactly is wrong with the "foundation" of javascript. The things that were added mostly were to fix problems of JS: arrow functions => because of "this" shenanigans template literals => I'd say a basic part of a language async/await => Promise/future hell destructuring, classes, enhanced object literals => These are all syntactic sugar/nice to haves. Nothing really was broken here. native modules => Another time I'd say that it's a basic part of a language |
|