because thats not the way debate works. you dont get to make a(n absurd) claim and then demand the other person disprove it with data across 100% of the spectrum.
I didn't say that this is how debates work. How they should work however:
> A: [some statement]
> B: I don't think that is the case. Could you share an example?
> A: [example]
See where nobody had to disprove anything with data across 100% of the spectrum? That's because nobody made the claim that A is wrong. You however made an absolute claim, so you have to provide the data for it.