|
|
|
|
|
|
by aliencat
1099 days ago
|
|
|
It seems that the 140x lower storage cost comes from:
1. S3 (OO) vs EBS (ES): about 5x
2. No indexing: About 10x ?
3. No data duplication (due to using S3 I assume) in HA deployment: 3x Is my math right? Or do you use something different for compression? 2 Orders of magnitude of storage saving is pretty impressive. |
|
|