[colinplamondon]

I would expect extracting out more of the meta-logic via GPT, and showing relevant panes dynamically.

If you get an error, automatically search for the answer and propose the change.

If you add a new flow uncovered by tests, propose the test.

Generally, have panes that are dynamic to what you are doing, and tightly couple them.

I could imagine looking at different zoom levels of a code file, folder, or architecture, and working primarily on abstractions, approving / rejecting the resulting proposed edits.

Strategic coding more akin to a game like Supreme Commander or Planetary Annihilation.

[icapybara]

This sounds kind of frustrating because it would be hard to predict or trigger. “Last time I ran into this error a super helpful window popped up, this time I’m getting nothing?”