|
|
|
|
|
by Zetice
1101 days ago
|
|
Why wouldn't it just describe the competition of sentiment if there was one? Edit: > Zetice starts off by suggesting the value of being able to summarize comments, positing it as a significant improvement to an unspecified system or feature. They further posit that such a summary could encapsulate the variety and contention of sentiments found within a thread. > In response, hackernewds expresses skepticism about the feasibility of such a task. They argue that the diversity and conflict of opinions often found in comments would make it difficult to produce an effective summary. > Zetice counters this viewpoint by asking why a summary couldn't reflect the existence of this diversity or conflict of sentiment if that is a prevailing characteristic of the comments in question. Seems fine to me, in principle. Would be nice to abbreviate further but that's just prompt engineering. |
|