This is obviously a neat project, and I'm excited to see it. But... I spent a couple of minutes scrolling through the summarised posts and my main takeaway was that it was extremely boring compared to the normal experience of reading HN. Instead of dipping in and out of content, finding interesting nuggets and jumping around between topics, this felt like listening to someone read out the football scores.
Understood, currently this project only focuses on articles - for fast scanning. Will take comments into consideration in my next step - it's comments that link users.
What I've been dreaming of is a "podcast" generated for a day of HN, but focusing on the comments and conversations.
I come here for the convos. But I also commute in a car, and I exercise with headphones.
I want like a radio show made of segments. Each segment is a post with the best conversations between users. Use a generative Ai voice service (like Coqui), and have it speak the comments aloud.
Then I can listen to interesting chatter through my headphones.
This is very cool, for sure. But what I'm looking for is something that is super optimized for threaded conversations, like this site. Imagine if each poster were a unique voice, and the format was basically listening to all of the top conversations for a given post, in a way that makes it easy to follow the conversation and back-and-forth from the threads. There would clearly need to be a little bit of design applied and some simplification, but I think that's where some GPT element could come into create a simplified conversation with a condensed amount of speakers.
Interesting, I think the point about processing with GPT is important. Our thing started as naive narration but many articles are hard to follow when simply narrated.
Much more useful to me would be to pull out the comments that have actual informational content. Most comments are upvoted just because they express sentiments that people agree with.
Why wouldn't it just describe the competition of sentiment if there was one?
Edit:
> Zetice starts off by suggesting the value of being able to summarize comments, positing it as a significant improvement to an unspecified system or feature. They further posit that such a summary could encapsulate the variety and contention of sentiments found within a thread.
> In response, hackernewds expresses skepticism about the feasibility of such a task. They argue that the diversity and conflict of opinions often found in comments would make it difficult to produce an effective summary.
> Zetice counters this viewpoint by asking why a summary couldn't reflect the existence of this diversity or conflict of sentiment if that is a prevailing characteristic of the comments in question.
Seems fine to me, in principle. Would be nice to abbreviate further but that's just prompt engineering.
Interesting, but I find much more value from discussion rather than the article itself.
Would be interesting to see how much value I’d get from a ChatGPT summary of the discussion rather than/in addition to the article. I could see that being much less “sterile” as well.
I wrote a tampermonkey script(1) so you don't have to navigate away and it shows you summary and takeaways right inside hacker news (2) div boxes, but i was using kagi.com/v1/summarization for the api which is now dead.
But this is the perfect fit for it as I see you have created services for extraction and summarisation which can be easily self hosted and turned into apis.
This is very cool, I have worked on a similar project, but haven't managed to take the time to finish & launch it. Some food for thought:
I was interested in being able to scroll Hacker News but instead of opening the article open the summary. It would be as interesting to read a summary of the discussion below.
Ideally, it's possible to easily get to the real thing. This way you can decide what's interesting to dive into deeper and where it's good to get an idea of the TL;DR: even if it might not be accurate which is the next interesting point of contention that would be interesting to drill further down.
A recent entry reads, "The author discusses their intentional approach to owning possessions". Here is a prompt that worked with this article, but I haven't tested in others. Davinci-003 temp=0
START
[Insert article]
STOP
A concise summary written in the third person:
START
Tyler Durden's famous quote "The things you own end up owning you" has inspired Carl to be intentional about what he owns and why. He keeps a record of all his possessions in a visual catalogue spreadsheet and only owns 192 items. He believes that a good night's sleep and a comfortable pair of shoes are priceless, so he looks after and appreciates the things he owns in an attempt to make them last. When his old Fiorentini + Baker shoes became unusable, he reached out to James McKiven of Whitstable Craft Co. on Twitter, who was able to upcycle them into wallets. Carl is amazed by James' craft and kindness, and recommends Whitstable Craft Co. for anyone looking for a new wallet or gift. He also reflects on the importance of relationships over transactions, and the value of framing the problem you're solving. Finally, he invites anyone who needs to escape their home office to come and visit The Skiff in Brighton.
STOP