|
|
|
|
|
by that_guy_iain
1111 days ago
|
|
> A gentle reminder that the whole history is here for show. This is very vulnerable — you can see the times I was in a rush, or when I took my time. You’ll find my mistakes. Either way, all I ask is please be kind. I know there are 50 things I could have done better, but this is a product of the reality at the time — a balance between something that works and something that was cost effective for Christian. The way I took Reddit's comments were there were things that could be optimised to reduce costs. I've not seen a codebase yet where that isn't true. Sadly, in the hands of Redditors who think you can host an API on AWS for $1 per million requests comments like come across as "Oh they did shoddy work". What I think is we're seeing production quality code like the majority of us have running. |
|
A payload of 25 comments vs a payload of 100, takes less time to generate and deliver.
So sometimes, to optimize his users experience, he might request 25 to show something quick to the user and then do a request for 100 and append it.
He also mentioned that he’s being compared to other apps, _not_ to the API limit (which he was under anyway).
So, can it be less?, of course. Heck, he could make it 1/minute or even 1/day. But his quota was 60/min. So why not use the 60?.