|
|
|
|
|
by l-p
1106 days ago
|
|
> If Reddit replaces volunteer mods with paid mods we would get a more
> consistent moderation and almost certainly a more professional experience. I can guarantee you the opposite. You'll have a site-wide abusable
Scunthorpe-incompatible report-based automated moderation with no proper appeal
mechanism in place because half a dozen underpaid interns/offshored employees
will be responsible for taking over the work of hundreds of moderators. It's already happening in some cases. There's ways to make reports go directly
to the so-called Anti-Evil Operations team who will irrevocably override any
moderation decision and enforce abusive reports. It's easy to get people banned, post some hateful content, wait for reports,
and then report the reports for report abuse. > But I can't think of any other social site that has such a bad rep for moderation. There are some legitimate cases of poorly moderated subreddits and mod abuse
(and the whole powermod issue), but beware, most of the time people complaining
about power-tripping mods and "not being able to say anything anymore" have
been banned for very good reasons (those reasons being straight-up hate speech
most of the time). |
|
They can do whatever they want with their platform, but I can also not like mods who make decisions I don't agree with.
I also don't think mods should be allowed to ban people just for being subscribed to other subs or having posted there. The whole idea that I co-sign everything the sub stands for just because I read it tells you all you need to know: they expect and often demand that you do in fact co-sign everything the sub stands for.
And that's the fundamental problem with reddit, really. It's not just the keyword squatting mods: it's that it's a giant social experiment that distills the worst of mob behavior and anonymity.
Fixing reddit requires some kind of check on the mods and the elimination or complete overhaul of the karma system.