|
|
|
|
|
by huggyface
5237 days ago
|
|
MySQL was very, very easy to get started with, getting to a cruise quickly. PostgreSQL offered more of a curve. In the Windows world the same is true of SQL Server -- the setup, connectivity, and basic usage is so incredibly easy that it made it the first choice of many teams. This seems incredible -- that products are chosen on such an irrelevant-in-the-long-term basis -- however it has proven true across almost all of the computing market, even targeting highly skilled developers. PHP has few competitive merits, yet it was the default option for many because it was so easy to make something basic in. There's a lesson there in that. |
|
I don't think there is anything too incredible in that. If you want to throw together an idea quickly, get it out there and test response then use whatever technology gets the job done quickest. You can always change later.
Why waste huge amounts of time setting up a technically perfect database for a product it turns out no-one wants?