Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by margalabargala 1099 days ago
It's hard to get to the billion dollar size and do literally zero things that anyone could criticize on moral grounds.

I would assert that there does not exist a company which is both larger than Patagonia, and more moral than they are.

1 comments

Least bad is not necessarily good.
Do you believe Patagonia has done net harm or net good in the world?
It depends on how much harm their microfibers and microplastics have done to however many number of people who ingested them.
Doesn’t it depend on everything?
You could also say least bad is not necessarily bad. It's a platitude.