|
|
|
|
|
by drdaeman
1106 days ago
|
|
Again. No system that I know about provides those properties today, so your "use one" advice is, unfortunately, impossible at the moment. Well, without having that rite I've already mentioned a few times (which violates the "convenience" property). It's an open standard that everyone are building siloed systems on. It's exactly as you have said - I'm not locked in to any single company, but if I have devices or programs from multiple companies that bundle different implementations and don't let others in, I don't have any means to make them interoperate. This could change someday. Fortunately, there is no fundamental design issue that prevents it. But I'm talking about what exists today and how the standard is bad for not even trying to address it, despite this being a very obvious issue. |
|