[neoncontrails]

I've been thinking about the strange loop that emerges when enough humans hire human-emulating machines to ghostwrite enough of their correspondence. Book reports, inane business emails, wedding vows. All of it. The full spectrum of the interhuman social experience, as expressed in and through language.

I tend to think that, as LLMs become ubiquitous and our interfaces to them get more and more "natural," the lines between human-authored text and LLM outputs will converge and get really, really blurry – more so, even, than they already are. The word "singularity" doesn't quite capture what I'm getting at, but "Hamiltonian" might. Speech acts, multinomial logits. Tomato, tomaahto. Aren't they ultimately just two symplectic representations of the very same thing – the richness and expressivity of human language? One can't evolve independently of the other. Or can it?