Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
ummonk
1111 days ago
It's 70% better than O(1). The algorithms it found are for sort3, sort4, and sort5, which were poorly optimized in LLVM's libc++.
1 comments
pclmulqdq
1110 days ago
It may have also laundered those from open-source code that wanted to optimize sort3, sort4, and sort5.
link