|
|
|
|
|
by mfalcao
1114 days ago
|
|
If that is actually him and he doesn't want to be associated with that persona then making this video [0] was a weird choice... But in any case it seems natural that people are curious about this, after all it's a popular project and listing virtual avatars as members is strange. At this point he should probably just own it if it is indeed him. [0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=effHrj0qmwk |
|
Because I'm not directly emotionally involved I can make the following response:
> he should probably just own it if it is indeed him
Well, maybe, but consider that he may just not want to. That should be respected.
> listing virtual avatars as members is strange
Not at all, really. Publishing under a pseudonym is the norm rather than the exception online, so is having multiple of them. Multiple on the same project may be unusual, but so what. They can do whatever the hell they want.
I agree on your other points and believe that a clear "we will leave this question open and would like you to stop wondering about it" would go further towards the goal than what's currently happening.