|
|
|
|
|
by charcircuit
1110 days ago
|
|
>If they can find a million people to watch movies on flights and/or use it as a monitor replacement A million people who are willing to pay ~12 times more than a Quest 2 and 7 times more than a Quest 3 when those devices also can let you watch movies or use them as a monitor replacement. |
|
My iPhone can let me watch movies and can be a monitor replacement, but it's bad at those things, so I don't do it.
I snooped around a bit online for something along the lines of "VR headset as a monitor replacement" - I'm not seeing any kind of consensus that these devices are up to the job.
If Apple's product is, then it's a game changer. It seems like they've put serious effort into some of the core problems: headset weight, refresh rates, AR concerns, pixelation. If that all sums up to be something that can be worn all day, then maybe people will see it as 7 times more valuable than a Quest 3.
A little under two-thirds of Americans have one Apple product, how good is the Quest at integrating into that ecosystem?