|
|
|
|
|
by riceart
1109 days ago
|
|
> With federation, there is no longer an incentive to do so, because you don't have a moat Domination is orthogonal to a technical federation feature. Once there is enough imbalance you defederate and that’s that. There’s nothing that inherently prevents gross imbalance from forming and the natural forces favoring centralization - such as funding one beefy instance - still apply. > value proposition for an instance to turn off federation today? Maybe not today, but it would be the same as any historical netsplit. > What do you think would happen if Reddit only had 1/2 of the subreddits anyone used and if you could keep access to all the same communities on a competitor? I think that puts them still in a fucking dominant position. And why automatically assume competitor vs cabal? Anyway good luck with your project. I’ve been using the internet since IRC and Usenet - both federated in their own way - both completely marginal. |
|
IRC was never federated. Usenet was, and it did die out - but so is email and it's working far longer than it had any right to.