Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by lonjil 1108 days ago
No it wasn't. WASM implementations are simply slower than native support. No browser uses HW accelerated decode for AVIF images or JXL. I think Safari might use HW for JPEG, but that's it across all browsers.
1 comments

>> Hardware accelerated handling was one of the arguments used to oppose a WASM based implementation

> No it wasn't.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33935355: "Wasm does not have the hardware acceleration necessary to efficiently do codecs."