[_kidlike]

So a Tesla driving off a cliff, is OK because it wasn't using the "FSD Beta" or whatever that idiot is marketing as the latest buzz?

Shouldn't the public be already outraging from the existing deaths? what's the difference... There will not be any change with an FSD death. As there wasn't with the previous deaths. Most people just don't care.

[simondotau]

Is it okay, you ask. Yes! Yes, it is okay to be factually accurate. It's not okay to be factually inaccurate in order to reject evidence which contradicts your position.

> So a Tesla driving off a cliff

This is a lie. There is no evidence that any Tesla vehicle has ever driven itself off a cliff.

Perhaps you are thinking about media reports from a few months ago where a human drove their vehicle off a cliff? If so, it is concerning that you misremembered and/or misrepresented this news event in this way. This news event was of a human driving a vehicle off a cliff. That vehicle happened to be a Tesla — noteworthy only because experts were saying that the chassis did an astoundingly good job of protecting its occupants.

No use of driving aids was ever alleged.

> Shouldn't the public be already outraging from the existing deaths?

Yes. A million people are killed by vehicles driven by humans every year. A million people dead. Every year. This is an outrage.

As for deaths where use of Tesla Autopilot is indicated or alleged, I find them no more outrageous than deaths involving any manufacturer's brand name for lane centering/adaptive cruise control. These features do not lower the driver's responsibility to keep the vehicle under control. And they do not diminish the accountability of the driver in the event of a collision.