|
|
|
|
|
|
by gregjor
1113 days ago
|
|
|
I gave my anecdotal evidence, and the evidence of numerous posts on HN and elsewhere you can easily search for. Or just look at the votes on our comments. Getting one person to post here with one opinion or another doesn't constitute useful data. It just adds one more anecdote. It looks like no one besides the two of us pay attention to this thread. In any case I engaged to express my opinion, not to prove you or myself right or wrong in our opinions. Time will tell. |
|
|
Votes are a popularity contest. I have a lot of downvotes. So you win the popularity contest. It's fine. Im ok with that.
I'm more going for the correctness contest here. Who's actually right? That's all I care about here.
>Getting one person to post here with one opinion or another doesn't constitute useful data
This isn't true. One person lends data to your case. Why? Because my claim is that nearly all people on HN aren't fooled by chatGPT. So if you say it's so common then just find one.
My claim is that it's so uncommon you can't even find one.
>I gave my anecdotal evidence, and the evidence of numerous posts on HN and elsewhere you can easily search for
I searched for this. I could not find one. You claim it's easily found, so you can win this debate by simply finding one comment that proves your point and link it here. If it's as common as you say then at least one person can be found. This makes sense.