|
|
|
|
|
by haldujai
1113 days ago
|
|
Just for clarity I don't mean to suggest at all that radiologists aren't paid well-enough (other than in private equity sweatshops but I feel like that's the case for any industry they buy into). > I’m surely misunderstanding you - you aren’t saying techs cost more than radiologists in Canada are you? Individually not at all but in aggregate yes. Disbursements to nursing/techs/allied health (who are also the majority of employees to be fair) are somewhere around 60% of hospital expenditures in Ontario (noting physicians are not included in this budget). It will vary from institution to institution (and union) but probably similar in most places, for MRI my last institution required 3 technologists per magnet (or 5 for 2 magnets) considering break rules, techs also got an after-hours premium so it worked out to something like $90/tech/hour. You'd also have to hire more as techs are employees so they get work-hour limits and time-off requirements (i.e. can't just offer "extra evening shifts" for those who want it, have to grow the pool) so add whatever employee overhead is (30%?). The radiologist fee depends on the study type and duration but to keep it simple I'd expect to bill $150-300 for an hour worth of MRI scans on average. These get reported the next business day so there's no extra cost from the radiologist perspective and we can tolerate the added volumes so no need to hire (an average radiologist working hard can cover 2-3 magnets worth of cases in realtime). For other modalities like ultrasound it's an even bigger gap, I'd expect to bill $30-60/technologist-hour worth of work. |
|
My day job is staffing magnets, and the staffing levels you mention exactly match what I do.
The radiologists struggle to keep up with our output when we do MSK work or horrendous post treatment livers - I think we need you over here.