|
|
|
|
|
by AnthonyMouse
1115 days ago
|
|
It's not really that bad? If you're operating at large scale you should have enough control over your own infrastructure to distribute load to multiple providers. Then if one of them is down, spin up more instances on another one. If you're operating at small scale, store your backups on another provider, and periodically test that you can quickly restore them to that provider. This isn't just about redundancy. Doing this is necessary to keep you from getting locked in. |
|
Sure, but that's not what people mean when they say cross cloud. It usually implies running active workloads.
Orchestrate hundreds of workloads that each depend on one another across several clouds and they reorganize upon a failure introduces a lot of new failure modes.