[FredPret]

We only need teachers because they generate STEM grads. No science would mean 90% of the value in education is gone. There's obviously value in learning history and English, but it's nothing transformative.

Until recently, the medical profession was literally leeching people until STEM stepped in with germ theory etc. The life expectancy value of going to the doctor was negative!

The US pays salespeople, leaders, entrepreneurs, and engineers a ton of money. And it shows in the results.

[imiric]

> We only need teachers because they generate STEM grads.

Only? No professions would exist without teachers. Education is fundamental to our society, and has been for millenia. There's nothing more transformative than a good education.

> No science would mean 90% of the value in education is gone.

Again, I'm not saying that science is not important. It plays a critical role in driving other fields forward. But I'd argue that an average teacher and health care worker are more valuable to society than an average IT professional, while the discrepancy in pay between them is abysmal. We only care about health care workers in times of crisis, but then quickly forget about them when it's not trendy to call them "heroes" anymore.

> Until recently, the medical profession was literally leeching people until STEM stepped in with germ theory etc.

I'm not talking about scientific breakthroughs that push other fields forward. Those obviously deserve the merit and recognition they have received. I'm talking about the value of the average working class professional in these fields, and their relative salaries.

> The US pays salespeople, leaders, entrepreneurs, and engineers a ton of money. And it shows in the results.

What results? How is a software "engineer" working for an adtech or social media giant to build spyware valuable to society exactly? Or yet another startup peddling their bullshit product designed to lure in investors and make their shareholders rich? Or the sleazy sales people making all those deals happen? You're telling me that this is somehow more valuable than health workers literally saving people's lives, or teachers building future professionals?

One group lives in luxury, while the other can barely make ends meet working a much more stressful and laborious job. This shows in the results, alright.

Thinking that somehow our profession is more important is indicative of the tech bubble we're in. But I'm not surprised to see such mentality on this forum.

[FredPret]

The content of a good education is 90% STEM.

If we had no tech, education would consist of learning history and poetry. It would still be useful, but would not transform our world.

[danaris]

> The content of a good education is 90% STEM.

This belief is a big part of why we have such a crisis of culture and politics today.

Education in civics and humanities are vital for understanding our culture, other cultures, ourselves, other people, our relations to them, and how best to participate in our society and government.

Education in practical skills—the kind that used to be taught in "home ec" courses—is vital for being able to navigate this world safely and effectively—things like how to make basic foods, how to balance finances, etc.

[FredPret]

I agree that there's a lot of value in civics as you call it. I'm not saying it should be cut out.

But if it weren't for leaders, salespeople, and STEM, we'd still be throwing rocks at sabre-tooth tigers; naked, hungry, sick, and hoping for the best.

Nearly every good thing in our world exists because we invented it, or invented a way to use a natural thing. Everything in home ec and all of bookkeeping were created and spread by prime movers.

The past few centuries of economic growth were ushered in by the industrial revolution, a staggering increase in global wealth culminating with people so rich that they have time to question the value of STEM, and with so few problems that they think what we're living through right now qualifies as a political crisis.