[mrpotato]

> If in fact wood turns into a truly viable alternative for satellite manufacturing, it does have some potential benefits compared to the typical metal alloys used in today’s constructions. For one, it is more environmentally friendly, across the board. It is easier, cheaper and cleaner to produce, and is much more disposable when it comes to a satellite's end-of-life.

There's no mention of how a wooden satellite would compare to a "standard" satellite in terms of weight. Would they be similar?