|
|
|
|
|
by RadiozRadioz
1118 days ago
|
|
So, it's Rundeck with a nicer user interface? Rundeck is Open Source and self-hostable, whereas this appears to be a proprietary hosted solution, which is prickly given that this tool will theoretically have administrator privileges on lots of stuff it automates. I've successfully trained non-technical users to do simple tasks on Rundeck, I don't think that's a big issue. Edit: And less functionality, it seems. No bash scripting or Ansible? Rundeck has a wealth of plugins[1] already, Onu will have to do some serious catchup. As it stands, I'll need to write more custom application code & glue for these Onu tasks than I would otherwise. The UI does look friendly though, and I've found that it's harder to get businesspeople to use something that doesn't look "modern" like this does. Perhaps Rundeck needs a CSS pack? [1]: https://docs.rundeck.com/docs/plugins/ |
|