[rajup]

Not how I read it. OP seems to completely dismiss the possibility that some surgical techniques may have been known in Ancient India because of what I’m sure is prejudice against one or more of religion/Hinduism/speaker(Modi in this case). Like I said the story about the elephant’s head is likely mythological/religious but that doesn’t take away from the other basic facts.

[qwytw]

Advanced surgery could hardly exist or be even close to efficient without drugs used to treat/reduce infections.

And when somebody says the thing about sewing heads nothing else that person says can really be taken seriously or be worth discussing.

[rustedspoon]

OP quotes saying that Indian politicians from the current party are being anti-science, but the first link where modi talks about religious texts is trying to link it to science.

If you read further in the link he talks about Aryabhata and space science and how we need to regain those.

This is anything but anti-science Seems pretty funny to me, the reference added to say that this Indian politician is anti science is actually trying to encourage ppl to become good at science. May be he using religious based texts, but that speech in the article isn’t really anti science though.

[bee_rider]

“Advanced” is sort of ambiguous, so it is hard to say what the original comment is really dismissing.