|
|
|
|
|
|
by venv
1115 days ago
|
|
|
Even this would require somehow verifying the raw data. It's plausible a bad actor could "reverse engineer" their data from a pre-determined conclusion. But yes, overall more openness is good. Still, the cost losing trust in society is very high (as you need to verify everything). |
|
|
I've already heard of someone planning a product ( initially targeted at lazy^H^H^H^Hbusy high schoolers and undergrads) that will use AI to reverse discover citations that fit a predetermined narrative in a research paper. Write whatever the hell you want, and the AI will do its best to backsolve a pile of citations that support your unsourced claims and arguments. The founder, and I use that term very generously, expects the academic community to net support this because it will boost citation counts for the vast majority of low citation, low visibility works.