[DCKing]

I did not expect ARM would take so long to catch up with even the Apple M1 or the same core designs in the Apple A14. The Cortex X3 in the current flagship chip Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 still _just_ fails to match the Apple A14 (let alone the A15 and A16), perhaps this little design boost is finally enough to match it.

If Microsoft can get Qualcomm to implement some of the same chip tricks Apple pulled off for x86 emulation performance they can use it for a potentially somewhat compelling laptop package. It's a tough ask though, as Qualcomm seems mostly to just use pretty vanilla ARM designs. And I don't expect anyone but Microsoft to be interested in taking that plunge.

[GeekyBear]

> I did not expect ARM would take so long to catch up with even the Apple M1 or the same core designs in the Apple A14.

As mentioned in the article, you might want to pay attention to the traditional difference between what ARM promises and what it delivers.

> these launch events have a history of making performance claims that don't align with what actually arrives in consumers' hands

[dagmx]

Part of that though is that Qualcomm etc tend to skimp versus the recommended cache values.

[als0]

This. Vendors skimp on cache size because of overall cost. But cache size is just as critical as CPU core when it comes to performance. Apple doesn't sell chips to anyone else, so they have no pressure to have small caches.

[GeekyBear]

Which chip that shipped to customers had performance that did align with ARM's projections?

[als0]

None, because of bad cache sizes and horrendous software

[GeekyBear]

None, from any vendor who licenses stock ARM cores?

[DCKing]

Sure, but it's worth noting that the Cortex X3 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is _almost_ at the level of the A14 in single core performance, just not quite there. Even if the performance bump is less than promised, they will still equal it.

[GeekyBear]

It's also worth comparing process nodes.

The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is on TSMC 4nm compared to the A14 on TSMC 5nm.

Also, the Cortex X4 spec projections are based on the second gen TSMC 3nm process node that isn't in volume production yet. If the M3 is announced (as rumored) next week at WWDC on the first gen TSMC 3nm, we'll have some basis for comparison (at least as far as projected specs go).

[f6v]

It’s a shame, Intel Surface Pro has underwhelming battery life. And ARM version really lacks in performance.

[smoldesu]

None of the manufacturers want in. x86 is unencumbered by licensing issues, and RISC-V is moving through evaluation like a jackrabbit on speed. Apple has incentive to make ARM chips - they're deep in bed with Softbank (ARM licenseholders) and were already designing their own ARM cores. Nvidia has a few industrial-application HPC ARM chips they manufacture, but have been noticeably quiet about ARM after the failed acquisition attempt. Intel is cashing in on fabless manufacturing and also not designing their own cores. AMD has it's headphones on and doesn't see the RISC truck barrelling down Main Street.

So... I would honestly be surprised if anyone tried, at this point. Most of the potential stakeholders don't seem super interested.