[dylan604]

no, but that driver might just be that much more successful if they get away with it. in fact, while not a mountain hairpin as your example, there was a recent race car driver that did a similar thing by intentionally using the wall as a push back to allow a maneuver that allowed for success.

so a clever comment attempting to prove a point is not always indicative of a proven point ;-)

[inopinatus]

This amounts to openly advocating for dangerous driving, which is exactly the reductio ad absurdum in rejecting the advice to lawyers above.

That maneuver by Ross Chastain? It is banned.

[hluska]

No, but a winky smile after an intentionally inflammatory reply is usually indicative of someone I’m not interested in reading again. Doubly so when they refuse to use capital letters.

[subarctic]

reading what again?

[roqi]

Anything you have to say, mostly.

[freejazz]

There's a difference between having a point and having a good point. You don't have the latter.