|
|
|
|
|
|
by AlexandrB
1118 days ago
|
|
|
As I mentioned in another comment, the listed risks are also notable because they largely omit economic risk. Something what will be especially acutely felt by those being laid off in favor of AI substitutes. I would argue that 30% unemployment is at least as much of a risk to the stability of society as AI generated misinformation. If one were particularly cynical, one could say that this is an attempt to frame AI risk in a manner that still allows AI companies to capture all the economic benefits of AI technology without consideration for those displaced by AI. |
|
|
People are being replaced by robots and AI because the latter are cheaper. That's the market force.
Cheaper means that more value us created. As a whole, people get more service for doing less work.
The problem is that the money or value saved trickles up to the rich.
The only solutions can be, regulations,
- do not tax anymore based on income from doing actual work.
- tax automated systems on their added value.
- use the tax generated capital to provide for a basic income for everybody.
In that way, the generated value goes to people who lost their jobs and to the working class as well.