|
|
|
|
|
by nixlim
1114 days ago
|
|
I am somewhat inclined to believe that this statement is aimed entirely at commercial sphere, which, at least in my mind, supports those arguing that this is a marketing ploy by the organizers of this campaign to make sure that their market share is protected. I think so for two reasons:
- a nefarious (or not so nefarious) state actor is not going to be affected by imposition of licensing or export controls. It seems to me rather naive to suppose that every state capable of doing so has not already scooped up all open source models and maybe nicked a few proprietary ones; and
- introduction of licensing or regulatory control will directly affect the small players (say, I wanted to build an AI in my basement) who would not be able to afford the cost of compliance. |
|