|
|
|
|
|
by magicfractal
1118 days ago
|
|
I unfortunately have never worked in a company where product managers are actually accomplishing their job descriptions due to the fact that most simply do not code and do not understand engineering in depth and hence can’t concrete/feasible action on where to take the product. I feel like at least in my personal experience things would’ve turned out the same with only engineers and managers and that most PMs work fit into David Graeber‘s Bullshit jobs (box tickers, taskmasters). |
|
>I unfortunately have never worked in a company where product managers are actually accomplishing their job descriptions due to the fact that most simply do not code and do not understand engineering in depth and hence can’t concrete/feasible action on where to take the product.
When I was a PM, I always found that the best developers were the ones who understood that PMs aren't suppose to understand the little technical details. It's the job of the developers to explain the tradeoffs in whatever code framework you choose, IE. Next.js or Gastby.js or whatever. A PM should not be coding nor do they need in depth engineering. It's your job to explain it.
The caveat is to the above is that you're building a highly technical product, so the PM should be technical enough to do his/her job well.
A lot of devs think that the only thing that goes into a product is the code. This is just not true. Sometimes coding is the easiest part. Coming up with what to build, and convincing the company to stand behind it, is often the hardest part.