|
|
|
|
|
|
by shadowgovt
1118 days ago
|
|
|
To be honest, if that happened I'd be 100% on board. My issue is combinatoric complexity, not a new way to do things. I'm not frustrated that we have constexpr; I'm frustrated I now have to worry about how it interacts with macros and namespaces and lifetimes and oh what if the values are templates and so on. Each feature adds superlinear cost to understanding the language and the code you're reading. |
|
|