|
|
|
|
|
by GenerWork
1121 days ago
|
|
>the need for "new", when in most cases something vaguely similar to WinXP or OSX is fine for 90% of things When you say that being vaguely similar to WinXP or OSX is fine for 90% of programs, is that in terms of looks, journey path, or something else? |
|
The article mentions this in the Business > User section, saying (removing euphemism and double negatives) the prevailing wisdom is that you will probably be fired unless you actively worsen the product, and provide metrics to explain how you did it.
I’d think that companies with customer bases that don’t actively hate them are less likely to have big layoff rounds, but I am not a UX expert.