|
|
|
|
|
by tmtvl
1114 days ago
|
|
The example that most typifies my issues with Clojure syntax is let-binding. In Lisp it's very clearly structured: (let ((foo bar)
baz
(quux frob))
...)
In Clojure not only are the bindings unstructured, they are thrown into a vector. Not a list, not a map (for which Clojure has dedicated syntax, mind), a vector. (let [foo bar baz quux frob]
...)
And that is one of the only two places I know of where Clojure arbitrarily uses a vector when it uses lists everywhere else: (defn foo [bar] ...)
Instead of either of: (defn foo (bar) ...)
[defn foo [bar] ...]
|
|