[mike741]

> There would be no need for review bomb if they were widely disliked.

This is circular reasoning. You're calling something a "review bomb" because you're assuming from the outset that its not widely disliked, despite the large amount of negative reviews suggesting it is in fact widely disliked.

[watwut]

I did not called it "review bomb", the whole thread started with the "review bomb" promise.

Review bomb is when whole group goes out of their way to seek content they disagree and then downvote it. There is zero reason to organize all of that for widely disliked content.

However, especially right wing groups do it against mildly popular content they do not want other people to see.