|
|
|
|
|
by TechBro8615
1125 days ago
|
|
The implication of this argument is that if people are dying, the government can implement any policy they want with the nominal intention of "saving lives," and nobody has any right to complain about "inconveniences" because they're not dead, unlike the people who died despite the policies meant to prevent their deaths. |
|
This is used to keep things in perspective when talking about such emotional subjects, not be a final word, I believe