|
|
|
|
|
by justinator
1115 days ago
|
|
>but their continuing to live there and be insured has to be subsidized by somebody somewhere I think insurance companies cover customers because the customers pay for the insurance. You're saying that because profits for insurance companies aren't at the level the insurance companies want, that they can say - because it's illegal to own an uninsured home, where people can and can not live? That seems like an overreach of power of a private company. |
|