Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by croes 1121 days ago
Pretty short sighted analysis of my post.

The companies I'm talking about do this since more than 50 years, that's why the infrastructure wasn't changed when the costs would have been lower because there was more time This changed would have benefited the poor too.

Now the time is running out and they choices are they suffer now because of higher costs or suffer later from the effects of climate change. They are the victims one way or the other.

2 comments

Time is not 'running out', time 'ran out'. I would encourage you to read some of the stuff on https://www.fasterthanexpected.com/
Their analysis is much more jaded and realistic than yours and actually reasons it out.

Yours is just three disjointed statements without anything supporting them.

It's pretty common knowledge that for instance the Koch brothers financed clinate change denial groups.

https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/fighting-climate-chaos/climat...