[Dudeman112]

There's always an individual with autism-level consideration for what one says, isn't there?

No, effectively DDOS-ing a service just because it says it's free and unlimited is a dick move

People like those are a big reason for why we can't have nice things

[hnfong]

I scanned through the comments and I don't think anyone raised the possibility that the developer might not be aware how many devices their code would be running on.

It's quite possible that a random just contracted to write software for some embedded system, with no context how many thousands or millions of devices it would run on. So they looked up OP's site, sees "supports unlimited requests and is free", shrugs and just writes implements the code.

Or, the dev might be told the system only had a couple thousand users, then somebody else copied the code and deployed it on a million devices.

You don't know the story, and I think the moral here is not to blame a faceless Android dev from China, but to implement quotas and controls and avoid falsely boast on your website that your service has unlimited scalability.

[nitrammm]

To me it just screams naivety to put up a free service, advertise it as unlimited and then calling people asshole when they make too many requests.

Personally I would never rely on a service like this since it's 100% obvious it would be sudpectible to junior developers misunderstanding what is reasonable usage.

If you're putting up an API assuming all consumers will consume it in some limited and reasonable way, then you need to rethink things a bit.

[ricardobayes]

Can you imagine a fast food restaurant franchise CEO to complain how annoying it is that people ask for copious amounts of free ketchup? If you don't have a policy or anti-abuse measures, don't complain that "people are using too much" of the free stuff. That's ridiculous and detached from real life.

[crote]

That one random guy asking for ten or twenty packets of ketchup every once in a while isn't the problem. Sure, it's weird, but he does put it all on his fries and he does eat it all, so that's just part of offering free ketchup.

However, would you still call it "detached from real life" if suddenly the manager from McDonalds starts showing up daily, filling a 100-gallon drum with ketchup because it is "free"? In law there is such a concept as a "reasonable person", which exists precisely to avoid people abusing loopholes like this.

[corobo]

> There's always an individual with autism-level consideration for what one says, isn't there?

What does this sentence even mean lmao

Autism-level consideration for what one says or not, if you say something is unlimited I'm going to take your word for it. If it's limited, tell me the limits. If it's free to a point, tell me the point. If I need to bust out the CC, tell me I need to bust out the CC.

Don't say your thing is free and unlimited if you can't handle unlimited traffic for free..

Hacker News would be on the complete opposite end of the anger scale if this was an ISP telling their users they can't actually use the "unlimited" they promised, haha

[Dudeman112]

>What does this sentence even mean lmao

>if you say something is unlimited I'm going to take your word for it

The sentence refers to people like you. It doesn't make you incredibly clever to consider those sentences literally, like small children or those with under-developed empathy and theory of mind often do

It just makes you an inconsiderate numpty

>Hacker News would be on the complete opposite

Yes, there are lots of people on the tech scene that just don't get ideas like "don't abuse it", or "considering the consequences for other people"

[corobo]

> Yes, there are lots of people on the tech scene that just don't get ideas like "don't abuse it", or "considering the consequences for other people"

It's not abuse if you say it's free and unlimited and someone uses it freely and unlimitedly! This is why sites have acceptable use policies and terms of service. This is why most sites don't say their tool is free and unlimited.

It is what those words mean. It is literal. If I read an acceptable use policy and then went on to use it in a way that is not allowed that would be silly.

> The sentence refers to people like you

> It just makes you an inconsiderate numpty

Speaking of "like small children or those with under-developed empathy and theory of mind", I'm not sure these were needed. Can we just discuss things? I promise my mind is open whether you insult it or not, I'm just not convinced by the argument at this point :)

I hope you got a nice slither of dopamine out of namecalling though in any case, haha

[Dudeman112]

>It is what those words mean. It is literal.

>I'm not sure these were needed

The original wording I was gonna use before deciding to be more considerate was "small children and autists"

If you can think of another short descriptor for "people who obtusely take things literally and are unable or refuse to account for other people's state of mind", I'm happy to use those instead

>I hope you got a nice slither of dopamine out of namecalling though in any case

In fact, it was far more than a sliver!

Upon further reflection, I think I got a lot of repressed anger for never having smacked people who can't behave unless they are explicitly told to do so, who actually need the "within reason" clause everywhere, and who are happy to play with technicalities when it comes to justifying their behaviour

[corobo]

You do make an aggressively fair point. I've also enjoyed the banter if nothing else :)

I dunno if my mind is changed just yet but if I'm honest with myself adding it to a widely deployed app would be in my 'dick move' category.

Just set your own up, or use a DNS method which comes with the bonus of built in caching.

For what it's worth I've never actually taken anyone up on their unlimited offers, I try to keep my services neat and tidy :)

[nitrammm]

> Yes, there are lots of people on the tech scene that just don't get ideas like "don't abuse it", or "considering the consequences for other people"

Got to love the cleverness with the people who design services with the assumption that there are no such people and then goes on to hackernews and cries when a kid in China breaks their site. Lol.

Insanely incompetent.

[tentacleuno]

In the context of an ISP, what is abuse in terms of network usage? For instance, I'm sure with console + PC gaming etc. a lot of gamers use around 400GB a month on average. Systems evolve, and it's the ISPs' job to keep up with demand.

[ransackdev]

Think of your average engineer doing mobile development. "Here, hit this url to get the device ip". They write the code, it makes 1 request. The average backend engineer isn't performance focused, why would the average mobile engineer be thinking about a distributed denial of service against some third party api? Most mobile engineers have to be guided to not slam their own backend servers, and do not approach problems in their sphere with the mindset to prevent this type of issue. Not knocking mobile devs, it's just literally not something they have to care about most of the time, and imo only the ones who go out of their way to have a solid understanding of the backend systems would even understand what's in play here

Besides that, odds are that this is malware of some sort hitting this service to get the infected device's public ip to phone it home for use in a command and control situation, and if so, they don't care that they are slamming this service.

Mobile devs who care about this type of thing will not need to make any sort of outbound connection anywhere to get the device ip address, it's right on the device already. These what's my ip sites are used by script kiddies and malicious software running on anything

"There's always an individual with autism-level consideration for what one says, isn't there?" isn't needed and I'd advise you to be more professional, or at least more human.

[endominus]

Relevant SMBC (especially to the sibling comments, holy shit): https://www.smbc-comics.com/?id=2095